How wise is it to put Multiple Intelligences (MI) at
the end of the course! We learn different things, approaches, learner autonomy,
rubric, PowerPoint, one-computer classroom and there MI at last to help us
blend all we have learned under one topic and help us create a constructive
classroom atmosphere.
I have learned to know the father of MI
and his contributions to society, different articles by other authors with one
common goal i.e., to help educators find ways to reach their students. This in
turn can help students to discover who they are and what they can do throughout
their learning process. Technology when used as a stimulus can trigger positive
factors in both teachers and students alike. When combined with MI, the lessons
become more interesting and students are more willing to do their lessons from
a very completely different perspective which indeed is a far cry from
traditional rote learning mode. "John
Dewey theorized that learning should not only prepare one for life, but should
also be an integral part of life itself." What a meaningful theory!
The
researchers concluded "The contrast between the enormous popularity of the
learning-styles approach within education and the lack of credible evidence for
its utility is, in our opinion, striking and disturbing,” Why? Because we know
the usefulness of MI in teaching but we don't apply it in our teaching. So, how
will we be able to help students with different learning styles? Why don't we
use technology to address the needs of the students? These are the questions
that I kept asking after reading all the articles. Because I didn't know how to
do it. Not a clue. Thanks for giving me the chance to learn this course. Like
Courtney said we walk in with our pockets empty, but when we walk out, it's
actually full of things which will be useful not only for us to teach but also
for those whom we have to help as long as we are teaching.
I
would like to quote a few lines from the article by Jane
Carlson-Pickering ( RITTI Fellows Research, November 1999) "It is inappropriate for teachers to assume that all students
can learn in the same way and can be force-fitted to one method of delivery.
The chosen technologies should also support the type of content to be shared
with students and the expected learning outcomes." It is a good suggestion
for all the teachers to handle technology with care so as to cater to the needs
of students with different MI. This article is particularly to my liking among
all the articles I had to read this week.
What
have I done? I have done my best in everything. But honestly, I am worried
about my project result. Can I do anything? No, because what is done can't be
undone, right? I just have to wait and see.
The
end to our course is drawing near. I can't thank enough Courtney for helping
all of us through the difficult times of our studies. Thank You!!
I
will definitely miss all my classmates who are helpful, smart and creative. I
will miss all the time we have spent together in the course. Thanks to Joan,
now we have a Facebook group on the web where we can still keep in touch with
each other.
Learning
is a life-long process. But when this is aided with technology, the process
itself comes to life and the learners enjoy it rather than see it as a burden.
Best,
Hi Kyi.
ReplyDeleteReally there are various types of intelligences in our classrooms. The students are from different society, cultures and environment with different characteristics and different learning styles. This week's reading became useful to recognize the intelligence and learning styles of the students with technology. Various aspects of technology can be used to address the student's needs which are necessary for the teachers.
Thanks
Tika
Hi Sophia!
ReplyDeleteThe sequencing of topics is certainly very well thought out and MI towards the end of this course serves the purpose of recalling and mixing what we have learnt so far.
Facebook group is a good place for future interaction and I will be joining it soon.
Best Regards!
Darshan